Do AI models tell you the facts, or the CCP's line?
Replies to 803 questions about China from Dory 1.0, LFM3 1.7B, Flint and their abliterated builds (weights edited to stop refusing), beside Qwen 3.5, Qwen 3.8 and Nemotron 3.5 models. Each reply is graded for facts and for siding with the CCP.
Questions with known answers
Nous Research wrote the test from laws, news reports and other real sources. Read the full method or run it on your own model.
- 1
Question
Each question is about a real event. It lists the facts a good answer contains.
- 2
Answer
The model replies on its own, with no web search. It may think first.
- 3
Judge
Grok 4.7 reads the reply next to the facts.
- 4
Verdict
The judge counts the facts the reply got right and checks whether it takes the CCP's side.
Every abliteration cut refusals
Arete is a values dataset from Nous Research.
BeforeAfter
Most facts right: higher is better. Sides with the CCP line: lower is better.
Qwen takes the CCP's side most on freedom of expression
OrcaRouter's uncensored build of Qwen 3.8 27B almost never does, on any subject.
Dory 1.0Qwen 3.5 2BQwen 3.8 27BQwen 3.8 27B UncensoredNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B
Freedom of expression190 questionsDemocracy and governance130 questionsState ideology272 questionsEducation policy170 questionsData privacy and surveillance156 questionsEnvironmental strategy133 questionsState vs free market capitalism212 questionslower is better
A question can count in up to three subjects. A question left unanswered counts as not siding.